|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSAL
BA and AA are trying for a third time to get anti-trust immunity granted so that the two airlines would be permitted to fix ticket prices and schedules - activity which would normally be illegal.
If the proposals were approved BA/AA would have a monopoly or near monopoly on some of the busiest routes between Europe and the US and they would effectively be able to behave as one airline. The deal is bad news for passengers, for travel agents, for corporate customers who will end up paying higher fares, and for the aviation industry which will see reduced competition. The deal is also bad news for the UK economy - with fewer airlines serving Heathrow, its position as Europe's number one hub will be under threat. The regulators need to show more than ever they are guarding the consumer's interest. We should all be saying "No Way BA/AA" TOP TEN FACTS AND FIGURES
For media requiring further information or to contact the Virgin Atlantic Press Office please visit our Press Office section of the website.
|
RELATED PRESS RELEASES
Virgin Atlantic urges European Commission to reject the planned virtual merger between BA and American Airlines
BA and AA are trying to "Stitch up" the world's largest air corridor 6 reasons why BA and AA would be against consumer interests BA should know about broken records - nothing's changed since they last failed to link-up with American Airlines Third time unlucky for consumers? Virgin Atlantic's Sir Richard Branson warns US Presidential candidates of anti-competitive link-up between BA and American Airlines RELATED ARTICLES
The Aviation Industry in Crisis: Where is US Leadership? - Steve Ridgway's speech IAC Lunch, Washington DC 7th October 2008
Regulators need to stop this game of monopoly - Daily Telegraph 5th September 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||